Most Viewed MLM News
1072 GRAMIN DAK SEVAK (GDS) Job 2017 ODISHA POSTAL CIRCLE RECRUITMENT
1072 GRAMIN DAK SEVAK (GD...
NURSE Government Jobs 2017 GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR RECRUITMENT
NURSE Government Jobs 201...
100 TEACHER Government Jobs 2017 KMC RECRUITMENT
100 TEACHER Government Jo...
Industry Experts Suggestions On How To Improve Your Multi Level Marketing
Industry Experts Suggesti...
Top 7 Best MLM Network Marketing Companies 2018 in India
Top 7 Best MLM Network Ma...
1065 ASSISTANT ENGINEER Government Jobs Post 2017 BPSC RECRUITMENT
1065 ASSISTANT ENGINEER G...
606 STATION CONTROLLER and other Job 2017 GUJARAT METRO RAIL RECRUITMENT
606 STATION CONTROLLER an...
TRAINEE ENGINEER and other vacancy LATEST JOBS IN CVPP RECRUITMENT 2018
TRAINEE ENGINEER and othe...
Government Says India Seeks To Block Most Cryptocurrencies in New Bill
Government Says India See...
PEON Government Recruitments 2017 ECOURTS JOBS NOTIFICATION
PEON Government Recruitme...

RetailMeNot uses free speech defense in reply to Mary Kay lawsuit

RetailMeNot uses free speech defense in reply to Mary Kay lawsuit

Austin-based RetailMeNot Inc. is using a free speech defense in a lawsuit filed by cosmetics maker Mary Kay Inc.



The digital coupon site filed its response Thursday saying Mary Kay attacked its free speech and its right to the use of publicly available information on the Internet.



Addison-based Mary Kay filed a lawsuit in March asking the court to bar RetailMeNot from using the Mary Kay name.



Mary Kay claimed in U.S. District Court in Dallas that it does not provide digital deals, offers and coupons for publication on RetailMeNot and hasn’t authorized or permitted the site to list deals, sales or codes using its name or likeness.



RetailMeNot said in a statement that it “rejects Mary Kay’s attack on the rights of Americans using its websites to freely exchange publicly available information over the Internet.”



The company, which bills itself as the largest source of online deals and coupons, believes it is protecting the interests of consumers in a case that could have a negative impact on online content and service providers.



“Mary Kay’s attempt to use trademark law in a manner that is inconsistent with fundamental principles of free speech should alarm consumers because it would deprive them of access to information about digital offers for their favorite retailers and brands,” RetailMeNot said.



The company is paid by listed retailers, but not all of them. It includes offers and listings for 70,000 retailers and brands. Shoppers use its website and app to research and download discounts and coupons. Here’s a link to RetailMeNot’s response.



Mary Kay charged RetailMeNot with trademark infringement, unfair competition, false advertisement, trademark dilution and unfair competition.



Mary Kay believes that by listing these coupons, RetailMeNot “misleads consumers” to believe that the two companies have a relationship to sell products at a reduced price. It claims this practice has only confused consumers of its products.



On Twitter: @MariaHalkias


  • 0 like
  • 0 Dislike
  • 0
  • Share
  • 854
  • Favorite
  • 22 May, 2015
Previous Next
feedback1

Coming Soon

DOWNLOAD MLM DIARY APP

appsicon